Ex-ante evaluation of research project funding : what is the importance of scientific quality?
29-41 p.
The paper presents a meta-analysis of peer-review system in a specific competitive scheme, the Research Project of the National Interest (PRIN), to verify how reforms of peer-review mechanisms in the ex-ante evaluation can improve reliability and transparency of the process beyond the effectiveness of selecting the best proposals. [Publisher's text].
Research infrastructures play a central role in contemporary science, allowing scholars to conduct high-level research and fostering data sharing and results' circulation. This case study, applied to a local community of sociologists, explores specific modes of use in social sciences, effects on research design, and users' opinions regarding the quality of scientific outputs derived from their exploitation. [Publisher's text].
Fait partie de
Welfare e ergonomia : V, 1, 2019-
Articles du même numéro (disponibles individuellement)
-
Informations
Code DOI : 10.3280/WE2019-001004
ISSN: 2531-9817
KEYWORDS
- Peer review, finanziamento ricerca, PRIN, valutazione, ex-ante, finanziamento su progetto
- Peer review, research funding, PRIN, evaluation, ex-ante, project funding