2019 - Franco Angeli
Articolo
Versione Digitale
Download | Copia/incolla | Stampa
Money as a political institution in the commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas to Aristotle's Ethica Nicomachea
35-61 p.
- Often, contemporary studies maintain that mediaeval thinkers regarded money as a commodity, a metal valuable only according to its intrinsic value; however, a thorough textual examination reveals that they were first and foremost concerned with its institutional dimension as a nomothetic moment of community building. This contribution aims at clarifying the late mediaeval conceptualisation of the nature of money as it emerges from the commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas to Aristotle's Ethica, V.8. "Talis fluxus et refluxus gratiarum commanere facit civitatem", notices Albert the Great, portraying money as an institution that guarantees this flow of mutual reciprocation. Money was then seen as the institution which brought together the different parts of the productive community, whose perpetuation was ensured via the government of the monetary system, allowing for balance among the interests of debtors and creditors, producers and rentiers, merchants and labourers. [Publisher's text].
Fa parte di
History of Economic Thought and Policy : 2, 2019-
Informazioni
Codice DOI: 10.3280/SPE2019-002002
ISSN: 2280-188X
PAROLE CHIAVE
- Mediaeval monetary history, Thomas Aquinas, Albert the Great, money of account, just price, usury
-
Nello stesso fascicolo
- The Economic Discourse of Joseph Garnier in Spain
- Money as a political institution in the commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas to Aristotle's Ethica Nicomachea
- Federico Caffè on the economic science in Italy
- What Went Wrong :the Failure of the 1993 Delors' White Paper
- International development and supranational integration in the letters between David Lilienthal and Jean Monnet, 1946-1963
- A Lesson from Bretton Woods On the Occasion of the 75th Anniversary of the Conference
- Book reviews