Something else too abominable to be nam'd : David Hume and Greek love
51-80 p.
Greek Love is a modern invention, asserts the classical scholar. David Hume can claim the title of inventor. In his 1751 Dialogue on morals he used the phrase to account for the relationship between a university boy and a man of merit. How did Hume come to this expression? Pederasty was a traditional sceptical topic against a universal standard for morals. What did Hume think of this practice and its origin? When he accounts for pederasty and homosocial arrangements by negative epithets, is Hume seriously condemning them or he is only and prudentially following the common use?.
The Article tries to give a first answer to these questions by examining Hume's writings and their sources (Plato, Plutarch, Cornelius Nepos and Cicero), and the views of the modern authors (Hobbes, Mandeville, Montesquieu, Charlemont, Smollet and Voltaire). The Article delineates the eighteenthcentury debate, without projecting on it our views, and maintains that, like some ancient philosophers according to Sextus Empricus, and possibly like Smith, Hume would have declared practice in itself indifferent. [Publisher's text].
Forma parte de
Rivista di storia della filosofia : LXXVII, 1, 2022-
Artículos del mismo número (disponibles individualmente)
-
Información
Código DOI: 10.3280/SF2022-001004
ISSN: 1972-5558
KEYWORDS
- David Hume, Greek Love, pæderasty, homosocial arrangements, relativism, A Dialogue