Why you should read classical Economic theory and the modern Economy : a response to James Ahiakpor

181-186 p.

• Articles du même numéro (disponibles individuellement)

  • The organic composition of capital and technological unemployment : Marx's and Ricardo's intellectual debt to John Barton and George Ramsay
  • Edgeworth's Figure 1 and the 'Complicated double adjustment' : labour exchange, production and remuneration
  • Research strategies of Paretian economists in the Interwar period in Italy
  • Keynes's Treatise on Probability at 100 : a Symposium : introduction
  • Keynes's Uncertainty as a tragic rational dilemma
  • A comment on Anna Carabelli's Keynes's Uncertainty as a tragic rational dilemma
  • Response to Carlo Zappia's comment
  • Keynes's Treatise on probability 100 years later : small vs. large worlds and closed vs. open systems
  • Re-Reading the Treatise : history will matter (again) in Economics : a comment on John B. Davis
  • Response to Valentina Erasmo's comment
  • Difficulties in the logical interpretation of probability
  • A comment on Donald Gillies's Difficulties in the logical interpretation of probability
  • Response to Carlo Zappia's comment
  • Keynes's Treatise on probability at 100 years : its most enduring message
  • Alternative approaches and a priori limits to mathematical modelling in Economics : a comment on Carlo Zappia's Keynes's Treatise on probability at 100 Years : its most enduring message
  • Response to Zeid Al Kaffaf's comment
  • Why you should read classical Economic theory and the modern Economy : a response to James Ahiakpor
  • Steven Kates on Why you should read classical Economic theory and the modern Economy : a rejoinder
  • Book reviews
• Informations

  Code DOI : 10.19272/202106103017

  ISSN: 1724-2169

  Permalink: http://digital.casalini.it/10.19272/202106103017